Greg Donald wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Walker <[email protected]> > wrote: >> As far as I'm concerned there's nothing non-RESTful about: >> >> http://host/chapter/2/photos?page=4&per_page=10 > > I agree, but all the question marks and ampersands pretty much > guarantee Google won't index it.
I certainly get that point. However, that's a different issue, unrelated to the RESTfulness of a URI. There are cases where it's probably a good thing that Google doesn't index certain pages. There's way to much garbage that people force Google to index that just makes finding what you really want next to impossible. Forums that get indexed come to mind. It drives me nuts that such a large percentage of what I'm looking for gets obscured by a bunch of useless hits on forum discussions. Blogs, yes. Forum posts I could live without in my search results! SEO is great, and useful, for sites that provide really useful search content, but there much that needs to be put on the web that really has no business showing up in Google results. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
