It looks like you are running out of memory (RAM) and disk-swapping is accounting for the difference in times.
On Mar 13, 2010, at 3:43 AM, Ease Bus wrote: > > Thanks all. The amount of data on the Ubuntu staging server is a little bit > more than the data on my Leopard laptop. So the slight difference in DB > access time seems reasonable. What worries me is the intolerably long time > the Ubuntu machine takes to produce the views. I also notice that the > ruby1.8 process on Ubuntu briefly shots up close 100% of the CPU during that > time. Below are the specs of the computers > > Snow Leopard Laptop : MacBook Pro 2.53 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB 1067 MHz > DDR3, 250.06 GB SATA hard drive > ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [universal-darwin10.0] > Rails 2.3.5 > mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.1.43, for apple-darwin10.2.0 (i386) using readline > 5.1 > Mongrel > > Ubuntu 9.10 Server (old former custom built Windows xp computer): Intel > Pentium 4 3.00 Ghz, 1G RAM, 18 (eighteen) GB hard drive. (IDE), 855 MB is > swap partition. > ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i486-linux] > Rails 2.3.5 > mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.1.37, for debian-linux-gnu (i486) using EditLine > wrapper > apache2 > Could the difference in hardware configuration explain the slowness in the > Ubuntu box? > > >> On my Leopard, I get: Completed in 643ms (DB: 322) | 302 Found > >> For Ubuntu, I get: Completed in 8803ms (DB: 517) | 302 Found -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
