Frank Kim wrote: > Okay here's why I want to do it. > The first table contains just data. > The second table will be a view whose data can change depending on > other external factors. It could change daily. > Yes this second table could be an association but I would have > preferred it not to be.
Well, then it really is two separate things, and it should be two separate things. You are right. Update the second table every so often with a scheduled task. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
