On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Phil Ostler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed you are right, changing the name of my application has fixed
> this. Thank you!
>
> Reason for me naming it Rails is because I have separate folders in my
> project development for different elements (e.g. Rails, Database Schema,
> Flex) and it always worked in Rails 2 fine for me this way.
>
> I've used rails3b before but was mix and matching gem versions to try
> and get around this problem.
>
> Now running Ruby 1.9.1-p378-rc2 with Rails 3.0.0.beta2!

>From what I've read 1.9.1 is NOT recommended for use with Rails3 beta
2, they want us to use the latest pre-release version of 1.9.2
instead.
-- 
Rick DeNatale

Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to