Amala Singh wrote: > If you cannot make this perform quicker in ruby language, I am afraid > that ROR will not be helpful in that way. > > ROR is basically a framework for quick development and maintenance. > To improve the performance you need to either do it via backend or > tweaking > the ROR in a complex way to perform better. The requirement you are > asking can be done in fewer lines of code in ROR. Check Active > Record tutorials and examples in the search engines. > > On 20 April 2010 15:19, Patrick Clas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> GameCollection.update or User.update. I'd be curious how I might be >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > -- > Nandri(Thanks in Tamil), > Amala Singh
Perhaps I'm not explaining myself properly. I want to take advantage of mysql queries to perform this faster instead of doing all the checks in the controller itself. That make more sense? I'm looking for the actual syntax of the ActiveRecord.update call and I've been unable to find any examples that do something similar. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
