On Apr 21, 3:03 am, Sven Svenson <[email protected]> wrote: > When I started using Rails around version 0.9, FastCGI was considered > one of the best ways to deploy Rails. That went out of fashion but I > don't know why. Then Mongrel was the hot thing and I've heard about > Phusion Passenger. > > What is wrong with deploying Rails with FastCGI? Was it just some sort > of shared hosting problem? > > Is anyone still using FastCGI and having success with Rails?
We always found it a bit flaky (on dedicated hardware). We switched away from it nearly 4 years ago so I don't really remember the precise flakiness but I vaguely recall fastcgi dispatches getting wedged and stuff like that. Fred > > Thanks. > > /sven > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
