Lee Smith wrote: > Thanks for the help guys. > > pepe, this is not a legacy table so I think I'm just going to add the > id and not fight conventions. The table is really just a link > table...linking a user to an article and calling it a favorite. > Nothing more...and that's why I went with the composite key. >
Seems reasonable. I've used composite_primary_keys and it works very well. I don't think you need to add the id in this case. > At least I know this could work with a gem though. Thanks again. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
