Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > If not...well, you're using form_for, right? That means you always have > an object that your form is reading from, right? That means you can > initialize defaults in the constructor. >
Duh. That's the clean way to do it, of course. Thank you, Marnen :) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
