> This seems like a good use case for has_many :through.
It sounds like an excellent case for has_many :through! haha i just did it using that method, it works great. thanks guys (Oh, am i posting right?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
