RobertWalker wrote: What I think is even more nuts is to have to slog through 137 pages of results without having a decent way to filer that down to just a few pages at most.
For example. I very rarely make it past about page 3 or 4 of a Google search result set. I'd never make it to page 125. RonPhillips wrote: > Exactly! If you search for some term, and then specify an ordering of > the results, the pages should be labeled with your ordering, not > numbers. > > Let's say you search for "dengue fever" and then order by author. The > page links should show the name of the author of the first article on > the page. Then it's easy to home in on Robert Abernathy, followed by > Robert Walker, then Frederick Cheung. Why make us guess that "Walker" > is going to be around 125, then click from page to page? Just label > the pages with the sorting field. > > Ron -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
