On Jun 4, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Raf Jaf wrote:
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Raf Jaf wrote:
According to my research, I have found nothing to indicate Rails/Ruby
supports native integration with JMS and mainframes.
It was only last week that we looked at Rails for the first time,
simply
because we want our client-exposed interfaces to be RESTful. Perhaps
Rails is overkill, but do you think Ramaze or Sinatra are better
because
they are more lightweight? They are still built on Ruby, which puts us
back in the boat: bridging the gap between Ruby and Java.
I found this article moments ago which discusses how to implement
ActiveRecord in Java. If I can get this to work in Rails with a custom
Java implementation that hooks into our Java data services, then my
problem is solved.
Rails is an end-to-end solution. Either use it as one...
I don't agree with this comment. In my experience there is nothing
wrong
with using special aspects of one framework alongside other
technologies.
Anyway, thanks for the info.
If you look at JRuby rather than 3 year old articles about AR in Java,
you might be in a very happy place. JRuby lets you call Java from Ruby
and there would be essentially zero cost to it. You can run Rails
under JRuby, too.
-Rob
Rob Biedenharn
http://agileconsultingllc.com
[email protected]
http://gaslightsoftware.com
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
