On Jun 12, 12:11 pm, Jian Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > In Ruby on Rails, routes.rb, if we create a "named route" > > map.something ":a/:b", :controller => 'foobar' > > it will also create "something_path" and "something_url" which are two > methods usable in the controller and in the view. Does "map.connect" > create something like that too? Otherwise, isn't "map.connect" somewhat > disadvantaged in this way? I checked that "connect_path" and > "connect_url" both aren't created automatically.
map.connect predates named routes. Fred > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
