Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Ar Chron wrote: >> It might be the simplest solution. > > That's a pretty bad idea. has_one is a little smelly, but it's there, > and it should work with :through. Better to solve the problem than to > kludge around the framework. >
True, but I guess it depends on which 'smell' you find least disagreeable... hence the 'might be'. If I had to have to working today, I'd work around the issue, and queue up the issue for analysis. If I had time to research, I'd dive into the framework code. But that choice is very situational. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
