Rory McKinley wrote: > On 20/06/2010 17:18, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > <snip> >> /users/edit would seem like it's supposed to edit *all* users. You >> probably want something like /user/edit . > <snip> > > Sorry, going to commit the sin of not answering your question directly > :) > > Would an approach such as this not make your interface less clear? > > Within the Rails interpretation of REST, a path such as user/edit would > still make it seem as if you are working on a collection rather than a > member.
Wrong. If that were so, map.resource wouldn't exist. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
