> You shouldn't need to. Because... (?)
(Not being facetious). On Jul 10, 2:11 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > MattB wrote: > >> variable_name > >> method_name > > > But why?! Since methods don't need (), how are we supposed to > > instinctively know what's a method and what isn't when reading someone > > elses code? (Or our own when we've forgotten what we wrote!) > > You shouldn't need to. The similarity is deliberate. > > (BTW, I would do CONSTANT_NAME, not CONSTANTNAME.) > > > > > Matt. > > > PS. Anyone play spot the Ruby Newbie, score 10 points! > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
