Well sort of. Basically you have a ton of states that are defined in the model, is there away to take those stares and define them in the db and have a fk pointing back to the main model. Normalized db. Repeated data extrapolated into another table.
On Sunday, July 18, 2010, poseid <[email protected]> wrote: > Not really sure, how to understand your question. > > I was also wondering on how to use AASM to extend states during run- > time. Is it this what you are asking? > > > On 16 Jul., 00:53, Me <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there a way to manage the states in AASM by keeping them in a table >> to normalize the data? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
