Bill Walton wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think you're right, but it wouldn't be hard to patch RDoc to recognize >> it if you want to. > > Code, as opposed to unsubstantiated assertions, would be much more > credible.
The OP's problem isn't mine, so I'm not going to spend the time writing that code. I was just trying to remind him that it's feasible if he wants to do it. No more, no less. In any case, it seems that a patch isn't necessary, based on the feature mentioned in http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/213558#927241 . I'm happy to know about that feature, and I will probably use it a great deal. > > Bill Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
