On Aug 2, 1:11 pm, Guo Yangguang <[email protected]> wrote: > > You're rescuing the exception but then you're re-raising it so your > > render call never happens. Also a more usual way is to call save and > > test the return value of that rather than call save! and rescue the > > exception > > Thanks fred.But i want transaction(which need save!) to let them all > either to be saved or not.If i rescue the exception and not re-raising > it,is it right to handle exception in this way?
in that case you should rescue the exception outside of the transaction Fred > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
