Michael Pavling wrote: > On 2 August 2010 17:29, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> > wrote: >> probably use a model or at least an enumeration for that. > As the OP said, s/he needs to store either Male or Female - those are > sexes. > > Certainly I agree on all the musings about gender-identity, and the > difference between physiological sex. But that's the point - it's the > physiological that I assume the OP wants to record.
I think this is an open question, and the OP needs to decide this for himself. Baby names would seem to have more to do with gender than sex. This is actually something of a data analysis issue. > > It might be an interesting experiment to store both sex *and* > gender-identity of the subject of the DB, but probably outside the > OP's requirement. Probably so. > >>�For genders, there are more than two categories > > I did say that... '"Masculine", "feminine", "neutral", etc' I wasn't sure whether you were talking about grammatical gender or sociological gender. > >>> but for the vast, overwhelming majority there are only >>> two choices; either being male or female, and that's your sex (whether >>> it changes over the duration of your life is a different debate :-) >> >> No. �Your sex doesn't change over the duration of your life if you're a >> human (at least, not without surgery, but that's a different debate). > > That (the potential surgical change) was my point. OK. > But it's interesting that you say "Sex is biological" (whereas I used > "physiological"), as can "biology" be changed with surgery - does > having my genitals removed change my biological sex as well as my > physiologically identifiable sex? That, I think, depends on how you define biological sex. If you interpret "biologically male" to mean "has a Y chromosome", then no. If you interpret "biologically male" as "possesses a penis", then yes. > If not... does that mean my DB needs > three fields?! arrgh! I suppose that depends on whether you care about all three pieces of data. I could imagine medical applications where you *would* need all three. > > >> God gave them. > > right... time for me to stop there :-) ? I'm using "God" as convenient shorthand for "God/whatever combination of natural forces came into play here". If that's a discussion-stopper for you, then I'm not sure how to respond to that. :) Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
