Fernando Perez wrote: >> Remember that RoR is a framework and not a language. Compare it to >> CodeIgniter, CakePHP, Symphony in the PHP space. > > No RoR is a thing to build websites, as pure php, symphony, and pure > ruby do, so it is fair to compare them.
It's fair to compare Rails and Symfony. It's fair to compare pure PHP and pure Ruby. That's about it, really. > > RoR is stuff written in Ruby that avoids writing boiler plate. No, it's much more than that, unless you have a very broad definition of "boilerplate". > > Beware 2 months is certainly no enough to get your app going. Of course it is. The app is very simple, and the OP should be able to get a usable version within 2 months (depending on how long it takes him to learn Ruby and Rails, of course). > In real > life, a usable blog takes more than 15 minutes to get built. Of course. 15 minutes is not 2 months. > > Have fun learning and working with Rails. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
