>>maybe you could just use the >>db to store a filename >From experience I would second this approach... in fact that is what I did on the app I referred to, once I put it off Heroku onto its own environ (as at least stand-alone on Heroku there is no file storage)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Dave Aronson <[email protected]> wrote: > If you *really* need to store big stuff, maybe you could just use the > db to store a filename? It will add overhead to make sure files get > deleted when the record goes away, but it could work. > > Or maybe use a document-oriented database? > > -Dave > > -- > Specialization is for insects. -RAH | Have Pun, Will Babble! -me > Programming Blog: http://codosaur.us | Work: http://davearonson.com > Leadership Blog: http://dare2xl.com | Play: http://davearonson.net > * * * * * WATCH THIS SPACE * * * * * | Ruby: http://mars.groupsite.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
