Colin Law wrote: > On 14 August 2010 21:04, Fearless Fool <[email protected]> wrote: >> Colin Law wrote: >>> All this hassle makes one wonder whether it might be possible to >>> combine the two databases into one. �That would make life a lot >>> simpler, if it were possible. >>> Colin >> >> Amen. �But since mine is a table containing >700K 18-column records of >> unchanging data, I'm not giving up without a fight. > > Why is that a reason for having it in a separate db?
It probably isn't. > > Colin Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] Sent from my iPhone -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
