Thanks Greg. I've added the following to my routes.rb:
map.add_groups '/users/add_groups/:id', :controller => 'users', :action
=> 'add_groups'
And changed url in form_remote_tag to:
<% form_remote_tag :update => 'divgrouptable', :url =>
add_groups_path(@user) do %>
...
and got it to work.
However, I cannot say I understand why I'd have to do this. I don't
really want to map the add_groups method to any url. In my original
example I was specifying the method name and the controller name in the
url:
<% form_remote_tag :url => { :controller => :users, :action =>
:add_groups } do %>
which should tell rails everything it needs to know to invoke the right
method in the right controller, routing should not have anything to do
with that. I understand that it obviously does but I don't understand
why.
Greg Donald wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Tomasz Romanowski
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I do have an "add_groups" method in UsersController. I have not messed
>> with routes.rb, just a standard mapping automatically added by scaffold:
>>
>> map.resources :users
>
> A route to :add_groups isn't provided by the map.resources :users
> entry, you have to add a custom route for that action.
>
> http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionController/Resources.html
>
> You can see what routes you have available by running `rake routes`.
>
>
> --
> Greg Donald
> destiney.com | gregdonald.com
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
