Greg Donald wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser > <[email protected]> wrote: >> (BTW, I recommend switching from Test::Unit to RSpec as soon as >> possible.) > > I recommend staying with Test::Unit. It comes with Rails and works > great.
I'm glad you like it. It is my experience, and that of a large number of other Rails developers, that using RSpec leads to more readable and maintainable tests that focus more on behavior and less on implementation. I don't see a single advantage of Test::Unit over RSpec (except for the trivial one of its being included with Rails), whereas RSpec has huge advantages over Test::Unit as I outlined above, as well as probably being more beginner-friendly. But we're losing the topic here, so I'll stop now. > > > -- > Greg Donald > destiney.com | gregdonald.com Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] Sent from my iPhone -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
