Adam Lassek wrote: > http://microformats.org/about > > They're usually created with XML, but I think this still qualifies. > It's taking an established standard and extending its functionality > through convention.
...which is not what Rails is doing here. No similarity IMHO. > > is there a better term for what this is? Isn't it just a fairly standard use of Ruby hashes? Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] Sent from my iPhone -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
