On Friday 10 September 2010, Kenneth Dunlap wrote: > Are there any decent backends for rails 3?
Yes: passenger and mongrel are very decent backends. > passenger is > disqualified because of it's unfriendly install. I have a software > distribution system. I don't compile software on production > machines. > mongrel2 is disqualified because it won't compile on *BSD, since > it insists on having sys/sendfile.h At least on Debian Linux there are binary packages for passenger (libapache2-mod-passenger) as well as mongrel. Apparently you are on a *BSD-based system. In case you haven't looked already, make sure there are no binary packages readily available for your systems. Consider building the necessary packages yourself and integrate them with your distribution system. >From your question I assume that you don't yet have much experience with deploying rails applications. If this is the case, I'd recommend using passenger in favor of mongrel and the more esoteric options. It is easier to get support and it is easier in production as there aren't as many (different) processes you need to monitor. -- If I misinterpreted your question, well, go ahead and use your experience. Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:[email protected] http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
