my point was that is you have a °publishing/approval" page there is no use
for ajax.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pavling <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 13 September 2010 13:36, radhames brito <[email protected]> wrote:
> > "What does using AJAX or not have to do with whether or not you use a
> > CAPTCHA process?"
> >
> > because some bots will bypass the captcha, and he will need a publishing
> > page  where he can delete those spams that get through because captcha
> alone
> > is not enough so at the end captcha is only an aid to stop most of the
> spam
> > but not all.
>
> Any bots that can bypass an AJAX captcha could bypass the same captcha
> on a non-AJAX submission.
> And AJAX or not, the choice is up to you whether to have a
> "publishing/approval" page.
>
> Again - There's nothing special about AJAX that makes any
> implementation of a "commentable" feature inherently less secure. It's
> *exactly* the same as a normal form submission/process procedure, just
> performed by Javascript and in the background to the user.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to