Please quote when replying. It's hard to follow the discussion otherwise.
radhames brito wrote: > yes but he is new to rails and there is a railscast for acts_as_tree, > thats > why i was suggesting it. So there's a Railscast. Big whoop. :) acts_as_tree is easy to use for some things, but so what? Its data model -- and therefore its performance -- is poor, and it can actually be harder to use than awesome_nested_set in certain cases. Just don't even consider it for serious work. > > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] Sent from my iPhone -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
