Michael Pavling wrote: > On 19 September 2010 17:37, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Michael Pavling wrote: >>> That won't help him comment his <td> though... >> >> Of course it will. �He can just put the whole <td> construct in an ERb >> comment tag. �ERb doesn't pay attention to HTML nesting. �Or am I >> misunderstanding what you're saying? > > The original line was: > <td><%= link_to 'Destroy', project, :confirm => 'Are you sure?', > :method => :delete %></td> > > so If I changed that to : > > <%# <td><%= link_to 'Destroy', project, :confirm => 'Are you sure?', > :method => :delete %></td> %> > > I would be squawked at by the parser, or rather, just get an > extraneous "</td> %>" in my HTML, because the comment would be closed > by the first "%>" > > Which is why I just tend to cut the the chase, and put an "if false" > around the lot.
Ah, yes. Hadn't thought about the extra %>. Duh. I should have read more carefully; sorry. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] Sent from my iPhone -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
