Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On Sep 21, 12:10�pm, Sunny Bogawat <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
> Just a hunch, but I think that by the time your after_update runs the
> associated objects have already finished saving (so their list of
> dirty attributes have clearer). You could validate this by stepping
> through AR's save code.
> 
> Fred

Fred, you're right and I have validated the same. I was hoping that 
someone else may have come up with a solution to this. Looks like, 
that;s not the case. Does anybody have suggestions?
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to