Michael Schuerig wrote:
> On Monday 27 September 2010, Amit Tomar wrote:
>> > Fred
>> 
>> But Fred lot of experts are saying ,mongerl doesn't render anything
>> while  apche handle the request and one more thing how do i make sure
>> apache is handling is request??
> 
> Amir, I'm not sure, but you might be misunderstanding what xsendfile is
> for and how it works. This mechanism is not intended to serve "ordinary"
> static files located in the public directory of an application. Rather,
> it is a way for your controller to hand off serving a file to Apache
> instead of doing it from within Rails.
> 
> So, your controller *has* to be involved. It's the job of the controller
> action to decide which file to return in the response and then call
> send_file with that file as a parameter. In the production environment,
> this has the effect that the Rails process does not respond with the
> file itself. Instead, Rails sets a special header which in turn is
> picked up by Apache (or nginx, lighttpd) and interpreted in such a way
> that it now serves the named file.
> 
> Michael
> 
> --
> Michael Schuerig
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://www.schuerig.de/michael/

Thanks michel
but michel  i downloaded 3.2 gb of streams,but when i trying download 4 
gb of stream ,i am getting only 10 mb of data...
what could be the problem
is there any restriction on file size to be served using apache 
mod_xsendfile.so
module
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to