I think that your problem is not non-sql database. Arel is "Relational Algebra for Ruby", so since you use non-relational DB, it's not a good idea to implement any adapters for Arel. But, Rails 3 has changed ActiveRecord's model architect (e.g. added ActiveModel), so you should try to implement some adapter for ActiveRecord, but not for the Arel. (Arel is just a query interface for ActiveRecord for relational databases)
On Oct 2, 8:33 pm, Frederick Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 2, 4:31 pm, dancinglightning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I'm considering to make my database* ActiveRecord compatible. To this > > end I have some questions, or would appreciate pointers where to ask: > > Do you really mean ActiveRecord compatible or do you just want to > implement the ActiveModel interface ? > > Fred > > > > > - as the db is not sql, I think writing an ActiveRecord/sql adapter > > isn't really the way to go. But then what is? > > - I've seen an old Arel had a memory implementation in ruby. As my db > > is a memory db (in ruby/C) this may be a way, alas the code I see has > > _little_ comments. Has anyone attempted such a thing (ie a non-sql > > implementation in arel) > > - is there a specific activerecord /arel mailing list ? > > > Thanks for any pointers (and sorry this is somewhat of-topic for > > most) > > > Torsten > > > *warpdb is a memory object(ish) database for > > rubyhttp://github.com/dancinglightning/warpdb > > It works for basic things, but has yet to see a real project, so > > you've been warned. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
