On 13 October 2010 03:15, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > Samnang wrote in post #949445: >> Hi all, >> >> I start looking in unobtrusive javascript functionality in Rails 3. I >> couldn't make any different when to use RJS vs pure Javascript >> template. >> >> For example: >> #RJS: >> page.replace_html, 'some_div', :partial => 'some_partial' >> >> #JS >> $("some_div").update("<%= escape_javascript(render('some_partial')) >> %>"); > > Well, you should never ever be writing ERb in your JavaScript like that. > JS files should IMHO always be static.
I've been looking at making a very JS heavy interface of late and it actually requires replacing sections of the page with dynamic content. Your take on it suggests that you could only ever return a static js script, and therefore have no dynamic content. Is that right? > > I lean more toward writing my JavaScript directly, at least with Rails > 2. But RJS might be nice for calling certain Ajax actions. The above examples merely do the same job with a cleaner syntax? Just trying to take a look at best practices and gauge what I would consider to be most appropriate. RobL -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
