Colin Law wrote in post #955556: > On 19 October 2010 21:06, Greg Willits <[email protected]> wrote: >> Aaa has_many Bbb and Bbb has_many Ccc. There is no :through involved. >> Ccc table does not have a FK back to Aaa. (Legacy schema.) > > I do not understand what you mean by 'there is no through involved'. > In the situation described you may say > Aaa :has_many :cccs, :through => :bbbs > then you may use aaa.cccs
My existing schema does not match the example laid out here: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html#the-has_many-through-association I do not have one table capable of pointing in parallel to two tables as diagramed. The schema I am working with is strictly A->B->C and not A->B and A->C. But, I'll give it a try as you guys seem to think it should still work. -- gw -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
