Is rspec ok or is shoulda better? On Tuesday, November 2, 2010, Peter Bell <[email protected]> wrote: > You're going to want to use something for unit testing as well. Acceptance > tests are great, but there is also a place for low level unit tests which run > fast and test specific calculations/operations. If you're using cucumber for > acceptance/integration tests, consider rspec for your unit tests. It's BDD > for unit testing . . . > > Best Wishes, > Peter > > On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:11 AM, yurokle wrote: > >> you mean some additional gems like (Shulda etc.) >> or testing frameworks like Steak? >> >> >> On Nov 2, 4:10 am, Me <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I use cucumber frequently. There are a lot of different frameworks to >>> do testing. Is there really a reason to use anything other than >>> cucumber as it does do db level testing with factories and stuff? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
