On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Dani Dani <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #960765: > > > > Associate each record with a company. > > > >> > Thank you Marnen. So it means each record should have an extra field to > associate a record with a certain company. I had this also in mind, but > I thought there are other better ways than this. > > Any more Ideas ? > Marnen's advice is the easiest and most usual way - create a Company model and then associate to it as needed. So the question you would have to answer is why not do it this way? There are apps which might create a new db for each company/client. There are sometimes reasons to do so, but I would not want to do this without a very good reason. That would be a second possible way. > Dani > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
