On Dec 8, 11:35 am, Fearless Fool <[email protected]> wrote: > My first instinct is to spawn a thread to run the process, and use a > carefully managed interface to provide updates. But I suspect that may > not work the way I expect -- it really depends on the lifecycle of > ActionPack transactions, no? (For example, would I need do a join > somewhere to keep the owning process alive long enough for the thread to > complete?) > Look at something like delayed_job..
Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
