On 5 January 2011 20:41, Daniel Oton <[email protected]> wrote: >> As I asked before, please include the appropriate bits of the previous >> post in your message so that it makes sense. As it stands this >> message will now make no sense to someone finding the thread in the >> future. > > Ok, I didn't know what you were meaning... :-) > >> Did you find that <%= form_for is now working for you? > > No, I have no idea. > > All my forms in edit and new views are <% form_for ... > > Should be <%= form_form inside <% form_for ?
I don't understand what you mean by form_for *inside* form_for. Are you using nested forms? However I now find myself very confused. I have just done some experiments and it seems that the = is not necessary. I am particularly confused as in the last few weeks there have been at least two occasions on which posters here have had problems which were fixed by using <%=. But as I said I have just tried myself and <% form_for seems to work perfectly ok. I do not understand this as I thought erb only included the result of the expression in the html if the = was present. Can someone with more knowledge of this comment please? Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
