On 7 January 2011 12:57, Tim Shaffer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, January 7, 2011 6:39:17 AM UTC-5, Colin Law wrote: >> >> I have always assumed that when using form_for in erb one should use >> <%= form_for ..... %> >> However having done some tests it appears that it works identically >> without the '=' so >> <% form_for ... %> is ok. >> >> Can anyone explain this? I thought that without the '=' the code >> would be run but the result would not be injected into the html. I >> appear to be wrong however. > > This is mentioned specifically in the Rails 3 release notes: > > http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/3_0_release_notes.html#action-view
That link says that one should now use <%= form_for. My confusion (now, at least) is that on rails 3.0.3 I find that it makes absolutely no difference whether one includes the = or not, which appears to be contrary to the information in the link. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
