hmm.. what happens if you use category.articles.limit(3).all.count On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Rob Nichols <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think I've found a workaround. > > category.articles.limit(3).count > > => 8 > > category.articles.find(:all, :limit => "3").count > > => 3 > > If I use the old Rails 2 methods, the system works correctly. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------- visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
