Thanks for posting that link :)

After reading a bit more I tend to agree with you that chaining where multiple times should result in an AND, and not in an OR (even though the example of doing a .where on the same attribute twice is a little silly)

On 16-2-2011 12:43, Colin Law wrote:
On 16 February 2011 09:44, Colin Law<[email protected]>  wrote:
On 16 February 2011 05:42, Mark Kremer<[email protected]>  wrote:
It may seem a bit odd with the where method chained twice like that, but the
query with the OR (Rails 3.0.4) will probably get you the result you want
whereas the query with the AND (Rails 3.0.3) will return 0 records at all
times (because the same attribute can't have two values).
I disagree that OR is the result one would want if one were to code
this.  I agree it is apparently a useless query and obviously one
would not code it exactly like this.  If the sql for this is
incorrectly generated however, it is likely that a more subtle, and
useful, query may also be encoded wrongly.  The principle of chained
where is that the first one is performed, then the next is performed
on the results of the first.  At least that is how I understand it.

Consider:
State.where(:abbreviation =>    'TX').where("abbreviation =  'NE'")
This (correctly in my view) uses AND in the query.
As 3.0.4 stands at the moment the above yields a different result to
State.where(:abbreviation =>    'TX').where(:abbreviation =>    'NE')
which seems incorrect to me.

I will post on rails-core to see what the response is there.
I posted to rails-core and apparently it is by design rather than a
bug.  The question seems to have stirred up a bit of a furore however,
see 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_thread/thread/407f746fd1de6636

Colin


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on 
Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to