On Feb 22, 9:52 pm, Jeremy Woertink <[email protected]> wrote: > Frederick Cheung wrote in post #983169: > > > On Feb 21, 3:39am, Jeremy Woertink <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Same thing happens if I call the full path to that partial. > > rspec should realise that the code under test is a helper is the spec > > is in spec/helpers (and so should add the required stuff to the test > > environment that allows you to call actionviewy stuff. > > > Fred > > I'm sorry, I don't quite understand. Are you saying I should require all > the ActionView stuff in my test? That might make the test pass, but when > I go to use the actual gem in development, it would fail, wouldn't it? > No. I'm saying that if your spec file is in spec/helpers then rspec should assume that it's dealing with a view helper, and so will set up the test environment accordingly.
Fred > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
