On Mar 25, 9:50 pm, Taylor Strait <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Fred - that was very helpful. Is there a more efficient way to > validate inclusion of that doesn't tax the database so heavily? >
Well personally I'd just use a foreign key constraint, but you could use validates presence of on the association Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
