On Sunday, May 15, 2011 12:44:08 PM UTC-4, DK wrote: > > Right. It is actually a really good question you raise, and yes a merge > would not be any different than two devs who have modified any other file, > git handles that gracefully. One thing I thoght of that at first I thought > would make a one file situation more difficult but on reflection make a one > file situation easier is rolling up migrations --- once I accumulate a lot > of migrations I roll them up and dump the contents of the schema into the > initial migration. Having one file would allow me just to delete text and > copy rather than having to delete files. Not a big deal but one less step. >
Yes, that would be a nice advantage. For Lobos, this could go one step further, as Clojure evaluates source code linearly, I could make the migrations ordered by their position into the file, thus making it really easy to reorder migrations. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
