On Monday, June 13, 2011 6:36:10 PM UTC-6, madth3 wrote: > > Hi: > > I'm new to RoR and I apologize if this is a dumb question but I've > read the guides, searched the archives and found nothing. > > If I generate a model object and then the scaffold_controller the > result is different than just running the scaffold generator (the > _form partial has no fields in the first case). > I did not expected this and I wanted to first create the models, tweak > them and then generate the scaffolds. > > Did I made a mistake somewhere or is this by design? > > Ruby 1.9.2 > Rails 3.0.7
You didn't make any mistake. It's just that the scaffold_controller generator is perhaps not as smart as you'd like it to be. It doesn't parse your migrations (or look at the current state of the database) in order to determine what attributes might exist on the associated model. As such, when creating your view templates, it can't build-out any references to any specific fields. However, the regular scaffold generator has the benefit of knowing the fields on the associated model because you provide them on the command line as "field:type" pairs: $ rails g scaffold MyModel name:string age:int [...] If you really want your scaffolded view templates to include all your fields in them, then I suggest simply using the regular scaffold generator _after_ having considered your data model enough to have a good, initial idea of what fields you want. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/Vg3tf1mWSGMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
