Thanks Conrad, that helps.

I'll use 3.1rc for the production app I'm about to start

Cheers!

Terry



On Jul 5, 9:55 pm, Conrad Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jul 5, 2011, at 2:40 AM, itsterry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Just a quickie...
>
> > I'm seeing Rails 3.2 Beta already on Github, though 3.1 is still at
> > RC4. Is the plan still to release 3.1 or are we skipping straight to
> > 3.2?
>
> > Forgive me if it's a dumb question: it's asked honestly.
>
> The Rails core team will always be working on more than one version of Rails 
> at any given time at different levels of the software pipeline.  For example,
>
> Rails 2.3.x : maintenance only
> Rails 3.0.x : mostly maintenance only
> Rails 3.1.x : release candidate
> Rails 3.2.x : minor release which contains new features and enhancements
>
> In short, they will be always working a future release and it will be 
> reflected in their respective Github repository.  If you're looking to build 
> a production Rails application today, I would recommend Rails 3.0.9 or 3.1rc.
>
> Good luck,
>
> -Conrad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to