On 9 August 2011 21:08, art tav <[email protected]> wrote: > Colin Law wrote in post #1015781: > >> The first thing to do is to get to valid html. You cannot make any >> conclusions about anything with invalid html. To check that it is >> valid view the page source (View > Page Source or similar in your >> browser) copy the complete text and paste it into the w3c html >> validator. When you have invalid html the browser (which will know >> that it is invalid) has to guess what you meant and it may not guess >> the way you intended. >> >> There is no point doing anything else until you have valid html. A >> golden rule of problem solving, if you know that something is not >> right then fix it before worrying about other things that may or may >> not be part of the problem. >> >> Colin > > Thanks for this information, i didn't know that w3s have a validator for > html, now i can use it to check things faster that using firebug or > other things. > > It seems like the site have a lot of things wrong, like i spected for > what i saw the first time in the source code, but the thing here is that > i don't own that site so i can't do something about that issues.
I don't understand, you are trying to get a form working on a site that you do not have control over? Colin > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
