I have an application running 3.0.9 and I'm trying to make sense of the request benchmark numbers. For example, this line:
Completed 200 OK in 17800ms (Views: 46.6ms | ActiveRecord: 334.6ms) My understanding from the past is that the difference between the total time and the combination of Views and ActiveRecord would be filter and controller processing. But in this case there is no processing like that. The only thing that would be slow should be various ActiveRecord calls. So are there cases where ActiveRecord calls are not being added to the ActiveRecord time in the logs? Then I've got entries like this, where the total time is less than Views + ActiveRecord: Completed 200 OK in 215ms (Views: 212.6ms | ActiveRecord: 1597.9ms) So what's up with this? I checked the rails issues on github but couldn't find anything so I thought I'd see if anyone else is getting similar numbers or has more information. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
