On Aug 11, 1:39 pm, sreid <[email protected]> wrote:
> For clarity, I was referring to the "update" object above being
> changed (it's a hash, created by factory girl gems attributes_for
> method).
>
> I guess at some point there is Rails code which converts this to
> string params for passing to the controller ? Maybe now in 3.1rc1,
> this also changes the update object ?

Possibly - but note that passing non-string values to a controller in
a functional test is a great way to cause really weird bugs. The live
code will DEFINITELY be getting strings, so your controllers should be
expecting them that way...

--Matt Jones

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to