On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Leo M. <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Nope. There's the main index: > 0.0.0.0:3000/posts #which is placed in => > /views/posts/index.html.erb > > and there's the tag action: > 0.0.0.0:3000/posts/tag/TAG_NAME #which is placed in > /views/posts/tag.html.erb > > what i'm asking is if they have the same code.
> 2. Nope. But I didn't get the right post neither before. Changing from > (params[:name]) to (params[:id]) didn't change big things. Even though > the url 0.0.0.0:3000/posts/tag/TAG_NAME or also > 0.0.0.0:3000/posts/tag/TAG_ID are recognized and loaded, they don't > display the relatives posts. > > can you put a debugger inside the tag action and paste the output of params.inspect > 3. In routes.rb there's this line that should be sufficient as > instruction, but maybe I'm missing something : > resources :posts > match ':controller(/:action(/:id(.:format)))' > > so the route that matches the url is the last one, so params[:id] should have the tag name in the tag action. are you sure you have posts in your database that are properly tagged? > Thanks for your help! > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------- visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
